turing · job posted 2026-10-28 · job updated 2026-11-05Apply
Turing built its AI-training arm on top of an existing remote-engineering marketplace, and the catalog reflects that. The bulk of the work is code generation evaluation, code review on real codebases, and stack-specific expert tasks. Software engineers clear $60–$120/hr, with senior (FAANG-equivalent) placements pushing into $130–$150+. The application includes a coding screen in addition to the conversational interview, which filters out non-engineers.
Applied through us? Track where you are and what comes next on your dashboard.
Turing
Turing
Turing
Turing
Turing
Turing
Turing
Turing
Turing
Turing
Showing the 60 most recent of 113 Turing listings. See all Turing jobs →
20 of Turing’s open listings publish an hourly rate. Their median top-of-range rate is $15/hr against $65/hr across every platform we track. These are the rates listings advertise, not what anyone has earned; Turing sets individual pay after you apply. See how every platform compares →
Researched October 14, 2026 · 4 sources
Yes. Turing is a real, profitable company, but reviews of its AI-training work are polarised, with complaints about verification, long waits for work and slow payouts.
204 reviews, 66% five-star and 26% one-star, so scores split sharply. Only 30 are from the past 12 months. Turing replies to about 22% of negative reviews, typically after more than a month.
The Turing Remote AI Trainer page has only 3 reviews, too few to read anything into.
Checked October 14, 2026. Review sites change daily; follow the link for the current figure.
Best for: Software engineers who can pass a coding screen and can wait for a project match.
Not for: Non-engineers, and anyone who needs to start earning quickly or cannot work US Pacific hours.
Worker complaints are what reviewers report, not findings by us. Spotted something out of date? Tell us.
Turing’s open listings grouped by the AI-training work they involve. Pay is the median top-of-range rate, shown when at least five listings of that kind state one.
| Kind of work | Open roles | Median top rate | Highest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rating AI answers | 47 | $15/hr | $150/hr |
| Writing training content | 9 | — | — |
| Voice recording | 6 | $200/hr | $200/hr |
| Data annotation | 2 | — | — |
| Expert consultation | 1 | — | — |
| Red-teaming | 1 | — | — |
Every listing is classified by the background it asks for. This is how Turing’s 113 open roles break down, with the median top rate wherever at least five listings publish one. Each category links to the matching roles across all platforms.
| Category | Listings | Median top rate |
|---|---|---|
| Miscellaneous | 35 | $15/hr |
| Software engineering | 24 | $83/hr |
| Languages & translation | 17 | — |
| Science & research | 8 | — |
| Design & creative | 6 | $200/hr |
| Business & consulting | 5 | — |
| Medicine & healthcare | 5 | — |
| Finance & accounting | 3 | — |
| Data science | 2 | — |
| Humanities | 2 | — |
| Mathematics | 2 | — |
| Engineering | 1 | — |
| General (no specialty) | 1 | — |
| Product & project management | 1 | — |
| Writing & editing | 1 | — |
Language-specific roles: Spanish (5), Japanese (4), Korean (4), Arabic (3), French (3), Turkish (3), Chinese (2), Dutch (2).
None of Turing’s current listings name a country, so they are open to applicants anywhere. Individual listings can still carry their own eligibility rules.
Side by side: pay, open roles, who can join and what comes after you apply.
Answers are generated from the live listings, so they change when the data does.
How Turing's AI-training arm works in 2026 — the engineering-heavy catalog, the coding screen in the application, what software engineers earn, and whether it's worth it for non-engineers.