Which has more open roles, CrowdGen or Turing?

Turing has more open roles: 122 against 60 on CrowdGen. Counts are refreshed daily from each platform's public listings.

How is applying to CrowdGen different from Turing?

CrowdGen: Entry-level friendly with broad eligibility; work is available in volume. Turing: Expect a coding screen as well as a conversational interview.

CrowdGen vs Turing

Two AI-training platforms side by side, from the roles they have open today and what we know about how each hires and pays. Numbers refresh daily.

Turing has more open roles: 122 against 60 on CrowdGen.
Turing is open to more places: 100% of its roles name no country restriction, against 37%.

Side by side

	CrowdGen	Turing
Open roles	60	122
Median top rate	—	$15/hr
Middle half of rates	—	$15/hr – $20/hr
Highest advertised	—	$200/hr
Open worldwide	37% of roles	100% of roles
Hires most for	Languages & translation, General (no specialty)	Software engineering, Miscellaneous, Science & research
Kinds of work	—	—
After you apply	Entry-level friendly with broad eligibility; work is available in volume.	Expect a coding screen as well as a conversational interview.
How it pays	—	—

Rates are what open listings advertise (median of the top of each range), not earnings. How we measure pay

CrowdGen

Appen's crowd platform for microtasks and search/data evaluation.

CrowdGen jobs and pay →Read our review

Turing

Engineering-heavy AI training — code generation and review for software engineers.

Turing jobs and pay →Read our review