Prolific vs Turing

Two AI-training platforms side by side, from the roles they have open today and what we know about how each hires and pays. Numbers refresh daily.

Side by side

ProlificTuring
Open roles553122
Median top rate$26/hr$15/hr
Middle half of rates$26/hr – $40/hr$15/hr – $20/hr
Highest advertised$120/hr$200/hr
Open worldwide100% of roles100% of roles
Hires most forLanguages & translation, Science & research, EngineeringSoftware engineering, Miscellaneous, Science & research
Kinds of work——
After you applyRecruitment runs through Prolific's Participant Recruitment program; expect your language fluency or developer skills to be checked.Expect a coding screen as well as a conversational interview.
How it pays——

Rates are what open listings advertise (median of the top of each range), not earnings. How we measure pay

Prolific

Participant-recruitment AI Trainer roles — language fluency and developer tasks.

Prolific jobs and pay →Read our review

Turing

Engineering-heavy AI training — code generation and review for software engineers.

Turing jobs and pay →Read our review

Prolific vs Turing: questions

Which pays more, Prolific or Turing?
Prolific advertises more: a median top rate of $26/hr against $15/hr at Turing. These are the rates in open listings (389 on Prolific, 19 on Turing), not earnings; each platform sets individual pay after you apply.
Which has more open roles, Prolific or Turing?
Prolific has more open roles: 553 against 122 on Turing. Counts are refreshed daily from each platform's public listings.
How is applying to Prolific different from Turing?
Prolific: Recruitment runs through Prolific's Participant Recruitment program; expect your language fluency or developer skills to be checked. Turing: Expect a coding screen as well as a conversational interview.

More comparisons